评分标准生成器

输入

Assignment Info

A persuasive essay for a high-school English class. Evaluate thesis clarity, quality and use of evidence, organization, style and voice, and grammar/mechanics. Should give students actionable feedback at each level.

Rubric Type

Analytic

Scale

4-point

Criteria Count

5

Education Level

Secondary

输出（节选）

Persuasive Essay Rubric (Analytic, 4-point)

Thesis (4 Exemplary -> 1 Beginning): 4 = clear, arguable, central; 1 = unclear or missing.
Evidence: 4 = relevant, well-integrated, cited; 1 = little or irrelevant support.
Organization: 4 = logical flow with strong transitions; 1 = disjointed.
Style & Voice: 4 = persuasive, audience-aware tone; 1 = flat or inconsistent.
Grammar & Mechanics: 4 = virtually error-free; 1 = errors impede meaning.
Total: __ / 20.

输入

Assignment Info

An elementary science fair project where students design an experiment, record results, and present a poster. Want a simple single-point rubric describing 'meets expectations,' with room to note what exceeds or needs work.

Rubric Type

Single-point

Scale

3-point

Criteria Count

4

Education Level

Elementary

输出（节选）

Science Fair Single-Point Rubric

| Needs Work | MEETS EXPECTATIONS | Exceeds |
|---|---|---|
|  | Question & hypothesis are clear |  |
|  | Experiment steps are followed and recorded |  |
|  | Results are shown with a chart or drawing |  |
|  | Poster is neat and explains findings |  |

Teacher writes specific notes in the left column (needs work) or right column (exceeds) for each row.

输入

Assignment Info

A graduate-level conference-style research presentation. Assess overall quality of the research, clarity of communication, command of the subject, visual aids, and ability to field questions. A single holistic score per level works best.

Rubric Type

Holistic

Scale

5-point

Criteria Count

5

Education Level

Graduate

输出（节选）

Research Presentation Rubric (Holistic, 5-point)

5 - Outstanding: Compelling, well-structured research; expert command; polished visuals; confident, accurate Q&A.
4 - Strong: Clear and well-supported with minor gaps.
3 - Competent: Solid but uneven; some unclear sections or weak visuals.
2 - Developing: Disorganized or thin evidence; struggles with questions.
1 - Insufficient: Unclear purpose, weak command, poor delivery.
Scored holistically across research, communication, command, visuals, and Q&A.